Eradication of hepatitis C virus and non-liver-related non-acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related events in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection.

We assessed non-liver-related non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related (NLR-NAR) events and mortality in a cohort of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients treated with interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), between 2000 and 2008. The censoring date was May 31, 2014. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the adjusted hazard rate (HR) of overall death in responders and nonresponders. Fine and Gray regression analysis was conducted to determine the adjusted subhazard rate (sHR) of NLR deaths and NLR-NAR events considering death as the competing risk. The NLR-NAR events analyzed included diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, cardiovascular events, NLR-NAR cancer, bone events, and non-AIDS-related infections. The variables for adjustment were age, sex, past AIDS, HIV transmission category, nadir CD4+ T-cell count, antiretroviral therapy, HIV RNA, liver fibrosis, HCV genotype, and exposure to specific anti-HIV drugs. Of the 1,625 patients included, 592 (36%) had a sustained viral response (SVR). After a median 5-year follow-up, SVR was found to be associated with a significant decrease in the hazard of diabetes mellitus (sHR, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.93; P = 0.024) and decline in the hazard of chronic renal failure close to the threshold of significance (sHR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.17-1.09; P = 0.075). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that eradication of HCV in coinfected patients is associated not only with a reduction in the frequency of death, HIV progression, and liver-related events, but also with a reduced hazard of diabetes mellitus and possibly of chronic renal failure. These findings argue for the prescription of HCV therapy in coinfected patients regardless of fibrosis stage. (Hepatology 2017;66:344-356).

Comparison of the prognostic value of liver biopsy and FIB-4 index in patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND: We compared the prognostic value of liver biopsy (LB) and FIB-4 index in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. METHODS: We studied patients from the Grupo de Estudio del SIDA 3603 study cohort, in whom fibrosis was evaluated at baseline using both LB (Metavir score) and FIB-4 index. We assessed overall death (OD) and liver-related events (LREs), defined as decompensation or hepatocellular carcinoma, whichever occurred first. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine the ability of LB and FIB-4 to predict outcomes. We also assessed the association between advanced fibrosis-LB (F3 or greater) or FIB-4 (≥3.25)-and outcomes using multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 903 patients (328 with sustained virologic response [SVR]). Baseline fibrosis by LB was as follows: F0, n = 71; F1, n = 242; F2, n = 236; F3, n = 236; F4, n = 118. Fibrosis by FIB-4 was as follows: ≤1, n = 148; >1 to <3.25, n = 597; ≥3.25, n = 158. After a median follow-up of 62 months, there were 46 deaths and 71 LREs. The area under the ROC curves for OD/LREs was 0.648 and 0.742 for LB and FIB-4, respectively (P = .006). Similar results were found for patients without SVR and for OD and LREs separately. The adjusted hazard ratios of OD or LRE were 1.740 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.119-2.7.06; P = .014) for advanced fibrosis assessed by LB and 3.896 (95% CI, 2.463-6.160; P < .001) assessed by FIB-4. CONCLUSIONS: FIB-4 outperformed LB as a predictor of OD and LRE. These findings are of relevance for clinical practice and research and call into question the role of LB as a gold standard for assessing prognosis in HIV/HCV coinfection.

Clinical effects of viral relapse after interferon plus ribavirin in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sustained viral response (SVR) after therapy with interferon-ribavirin (IF-RB) reduces liver-related (LR) complications and mortality in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients. Here, we assess the impact of end-of-treatment response with subsequent relapse (REL) on LR events (LR death, liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, or liver transplantation), and liver stiffness (LS) by transient elastography. METHODS: We analyzed the GESIDA 3603 Cohort (HIV/HCV-co-infected patients treated with IF-RB in 19 centers in Spain). Response to IF-RB was categorized as SVR, REL, and no response (NR). The study started when IF-RB was stopped and ended at death or the last follow-up visit. Multivariate regression analyses were adjusted for age, sex, HIV category of transmission, CDC clinical category, nadir CD4+ cell count, HCV genotype, HCV-RNA viral load, and liver fibrosis. RESULTS: Of 1599 patients included, response was categorized as NR in 765, REL in 250 and SVR in 584. Median follow-up was more than 4 years in each group. Taking the group of patients with NR as reference, we found that the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of liver-related events (liver-related death, liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation) for patients with REL and for patients with SVR were 0.17 (0.05; 0.50) and 0.03 (0; 0.20), respectively. We also found that SVR was followed by less liver stiffness than both REL and NR. However, REL was associated with less liver stiffness than NR. CONCLUSIONS: Best outcomes were achieved with an SVR. However, REL was associated with less LR mortality, decompensation, and liver stiffness than NR.

Sustained virological response to interferon plus ribavirin reduces non-liver-related mortality in patients coinfected with HIV and Hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND: Sustained virological response (SVR) after therapy with interferon plus ribavirin reduces liver-related complications and mortality in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). We assessed the effect of SVR on HIV progression and mortality not related to liver disease. METHODS: An observational cohort study including consecutive HIV/HCV-coinfected patients treated with interferon plus ribavirin between 2000 and 2008 in 19 centers in Spain. RESULTS: Of 1599 patients, 626 (39%) had an SVR. After a median follow-up of approximately 5 years, we confirmed that failure to achieve an SVR was associated with an increased risk of liver-related events and liver-related death. We also observed higher rates of the following events in nonresponders than in responders: AIDS-defining conditions (rate per 100 person years, 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI), .59-1.10] vs 0.29 [.10-.48]; P= .003), non-liver-related deaths (0.65 [.42-.87] vs 0.16 [.02-.30]; P = .002), and non-liver-related, non-AIDS-related deaths (0.55 [.34-.75] vs 0.16 [.02-.30]; P = .002). Cox regression analysis showed that the adjusted hazard ratios of new AIDS-defining conditions, non-liver-related deaths, and non-liver-related, non-AIDS-related deaths for nonresponders compared with responders were 1.90 (95% CI, .89-4.10; P = .095), 3.19 (1.21-8.40; P = .019), and 2.85 (1.07-7.60; P = .036), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that eradication of HCV after therapy with interferon plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is associated not only with a reduction in liver-related events but also with a reduction in HIV progression and mortality not related to liver disease.

[Immunological effectiveness of the nucleoside/nucleotide analog combinations, tenofovir + lamivudine, didanosine + lamivudine and tenofovir + didanosine, in patients with HIV infection and sustained viral suppression]. / Efectividad inmunológica de las combinaciones de análogos de nucleósidos/nucleótidos, tenofovir + lamivudina, didanosina + lamivudina y tenofovir + didanosina, en pacientes con infección por el VIH y supresión virológica mantenida.

BACKGROUND: Several recent studies have shown that the combination of ddI plus TDF can produce an unexpected drop in CD4 cell counts, even after correcting the ddI dose. OBJECTIVE: Comparative study of the immunological effectiveness of various once-daily NRTI backbones (ddI plus TDF, ddI plus 3TC or TDF plus 3TC) in antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients achieving viral suppression (PCR, HIV-RNA < 50 copies/microl). METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 48 weeks' duration following viral load suppression with any of the NRTI combinations studied. The main outcome variable was the increase in CD4+ lymphocyte count from the time that viral load was undetectable or treatment was changed for simplification or toxicity (baseline) up to 48 weeks of follow-up. Differences between the assigned therapies were compared. The variables included in analysis were age, sex, risk group, HCV infection, clinical categories of HIV (CDC criteria), lowest CD4 cell count, reason for change of NRTI backbone, type of antiretroviral treatment (PI, NNRTI, or 3 NRTI) and duration of suppressed viral load. RESULTS. Regimens including ddI plus TDF showed significant decreases in CD4 cell counts with adjustments by type of HAART, reason for change, and duration of suppressed viral load. In patients treated with TDF + 3TC, CD4 count increased by 160 cel/microl (95% CI, 53-266) more than in patients treated with TDF + ddI; and in patients receiving ddI + 3TC, CD4+ count increased by 138 cel/microl (95% CI, 25-266) more than in patients receiving TDF + ddI. CONCLUSIONS: The ddI plus TDF backbone seems unadvisable because of the lower associated CD4 cell counts, and because it is poorer than the other options from the immunological standpoint.

Efectividad inmunologica de las combinaciones de analogos de nucleosidos / nucleotidos, tenofovir + lamivudina, didanosina + lamivudina y tenofovir + didanosina, en pacientes con infeccion por el VIH y supresion virologica mantenida / Immunological effectiveness of the nucleoside / nucleotide analog combinations, tenofovir + lamivudine, didanosine + lamivudine and tenofovir + didanosine, in patients with HIV infection and sustained viral suppression

Antecedentes. Recientemente, se ha comunicado en varios artículos que la combinación tenofovir (TDF) y didanosina (ddI) puede tener efecto paradójico en la respuesta inmunológica, incluso tras el ajuste de dosis de ddI. Objetivo. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar en pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH), con supresión virológica (reacción en cadena de la polimerasa [PCR] ARN-VIH < 50 copias/ìl), la efectividad inmunológica de ddI + TDF frente a ddI + lamivudina (3TC) o TDF + 3TC. Métodos. Estudio de cohortes prospectivo de 48 semanas de duración tras supresión virológica con cualquiera de las combinaciones de inhibidores de transcriptasa inversa nucleósidos (NRTI) del estudio. La variable principal de evaluación fue el incremento de la cifra de linfocitos CD4 desde el momento en que el paciente tiene una carga viral indetectable o desde el momento del cambio por simplificación o toxicidad (visita basal) hasta las 48 semanas. Introdujimos como variables de ajuste para dicho análisis la edad, el sexo, el grupo de riesgo, la infección por virus de la hepatitis C (VHC), el grupo de clasificación del Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), recuento delinfocitos CD4+ nadir, motivos del cambio, el tipo de tratamiento antirretroviral (inhibidor de proteasa [IP], inhibidor de transcriptasa inversa no nucleósido [NNRTI] o combinación de inhibidores de transcriptasa inversa nucleósidos [3 NRTI]) y tiempo con carga viral indetectable. Resultados. Los regímenes que incluyeron TDF + ddI mostraron una reducción del recuento de CD4+. Ajustando por el tipo de tratamiento antirretroviral de gran actividad (TARGA), por los motivos del cambio, y por el tiempo con carga viral indetectable, en los pacientes que recibieron TDF + 3TC la cifra de linfocitos CD4 aumentó en 160 cél./ìl (intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 53-266) más que en los pacientes que recibieron TDF + ddI y que los pacientes que recibieron ddI + 3TC aumentaron 138 cél./ìl (IC 95%: 25-266) más que los que recibieron TDF + ddI. Conclusiones. La combinación ddI + TDF no es aconsejable, no sólo porque puede producir descenso del recuento de linfocitos CD4+, sino porque desde el punto de vista inmunológico es peor que las otras combinaciones (AU)

Background. Several recent studies have shown that the combination of ddI plus TDF can produce an unexpected drop in CD4 cell counts, even after correcting the ddI dose. Objective. Comparative study of the immunological effectiveness of various once-daily NRTI backbones (ddI plus TDF, ddI plus 3TC or TDF plus 3TC) in antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients achieving viral suppression (PCR, HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ìl). Methods. Prospective cohort study of 48 weeks' duration following viral load suppression with any of the NRTI combinations studied. The main outcome variable was the increase in CD4+ lymphocyte count from the time that viral load was undetectable or treatment was changed for simplification or toxicity (baseline) up to 48 weeks of follow-up. Differences between the assigned therapies were compared. The variables included in analysis were age, sex, risk group, HCV infection, clinical categories of HIV (CDC criteria), lowest CD4 cell count, reason for change of NRTI backbone, type of antiretroviral treatment (PI, NNRTI, or 3 NRTI) and duration of suppressed viral load. Results. Regimens including ddI plus TDF showed significant decreases in CD4 cell counts with adjustments by type of HAART, reason for change, and duration of suppressed viral load. In patients treated with TDF + 3TC, CD4 count increased by 160 cel/ìl (95% CI, 53-266) more than in patients treated with TDF + ddI; and in patients receiving ddI + 3TC, CD4+ count increased by 138 cel/ìl (95% CI, 25-266) more than in patients receiving TDF + ddI. Conclusions. The ddI plus TDF backbone seems unadvisable because of the lower associated CD4 cell counts, and because it is poorer than the other options from the immunological standpoint (AU)